Dean’s Boxes

Not too long ago, Dean Kamen came to Bentley as part of a panel to speak about the role of business in making the world a better place. As someone who got a lot out of FIRST, despite a roster of big-name executives, it was Dean Kamen that I was most excited about seeing.

He mentioned that he’d invented “two boxes” that could help the developing world, but that the fixed costs of production were too prohibitive; without a ‘mass market’ for them, he couldn’t move beyond prototypes.

The first box, he explained, had two hoses. You fed liquid into the first, and pure water came out the second. (Not water with most contaminants removed, but 100% pure water: he told us that it met the standards for water used in injections.)

The second box would burn anything flammable and generate electricity. He talked about how, in a remote village, it led to a mini-economy: someone ran the machine, someone else provided them with manure, and someone else resold the electricity.

I think there are plenty of applications for both of these, though. Imagine:

  • RVs and boats have two tanks: one for potable water to drink / shower in, and one to collect ‘waste’ water. You, of course, have to work on emptying the waste container often, and on filling the potable water one. With Box #1, you could get potable water out of waste water, reducing how often you have to fill/empty the tanks.
  • We’ve gone through a bunch of old junk here, and I’ve been working on shredding boxes of old financial documents before we throw them out. How handy would it be to take them into the back yard, throw them into Box #2 to be incinerated, and get a little break on our electric bill in the process?
  • I’d imagine that human waste could be flammable, at least after water was extracted from it. (But I’ve never tried?) Box #2 might have its place on an RV.
    • And, if that works, why not build an awesome Port-a-Potty? You could have a sink with clean water for hand-washing, and electricity to power a fan / heat / air freshener. And you wouldn’t have to empty any tanks.
  • Do you have any idea how many places in the world don’t have clean water? It’s not a problem that only exists in a couple little ghettos. Even though you and I have an endless of clean water when we turn on our faucet, an enormous part of the world doesn’t. The machines might be expensive, but I bet entrepreneurs would love to sell clean water.
  • We have a Brita water filter at school, so that we don’t have to drink tap water. Imagine if we had a building-wide machine that would take ‘tap water’ into the building and make the water coming out of all the faucets pure. (Well, I suppose you’d have to clean out the pipes first, but I digress.)
  • We could cut down on our water usage, by ‘reusing’ water. Feed the pipe going to the septic system back into the machine. (And what doesn’t become water might be able to be burned to generate electricity.) Surely there’s some loss, but it could at least reduce your use on the water supply. Those with wells wouldn’t have to worry as much about running out, and those who had town water could see a savings in their bills.

I’m convinced that both of these machines could be pretty popular if they ever went into mass-production.

Hilarious Video Roundup

Here’s a collection of some of the most hilarious videos on YouTube and the like:

eBay

My very first auction.  (I doubt any of you guys would want it, but I felt compelled to link anyway.)

I’m testing my theory that good pictures + good descriptions + really low starting price will make it irresistible. At least to people like me.

Network Problems

PuTTY tells me “No route to host” when I try to ssh into this machine, and ping gives a similar complaint. And yet I’m viewing the site, refreshing, and now posting just fine.

What could possibly be going on to cause that? It’s not “Connection refused” as if sshd died, it’s “No route to host,” and yet I’m here at the exact same host just fine.

Organizational Strategy

After procrastinating all sorts of organizational projects by reading about organization instead, I think I’ve finally hit upon the secret to organizing.

Get a big trashcan. Use it liberally.

Seriously, though. I’ll pick through the stack of papers on my desk wondering how to organize them, and find receipts for a pack of gum from four months ago and credit card offers that I never intend to open. I go through my (digital) desktop and find drafts of things I worked on four months ago. I don’t even need the final version, much less an abandoned draft.  I won’t even comment on my Inbox.  Err, Inboxes.

The key to organizing isn’t buying lots of little boxes and cabinets. It’s of buying one big box, and it’s not just any box. It’s a dumpster. But then you have to start using it more effectively: as soon as you decide you don’t need something, throw it out. When you check your e-mail and just get a bunch of junk, before you grumble and close the program, delete the unwanted messages. When you check the snail mail and it’s just credit card offers from predatory lenders, stick them in the shredder. (It’s fun!) And when you go to neaten out that drawer, if you don’t know why you have it, just throw it out!

off to throw away some more stuff

Link Roundup

Here are some links I think I should share:

If I Had a Million Dollars…

…I’d buy a gas station and teach economics.

The two are intertwined, though. I don’t think running a gas station would be that fun, and I don’t know that I’d enjoy teaching economics either. But the two together could be interesting.

Gas, for example, strikes me as quite inelastic. Even when gas prices were around $3.50 out here, we bought it. I didn’t reduce how much I drove. And with gas prices still very high, I ended up taking a small hit in gas mileage when I ended up buying an SUV.

Economics is generally a boring subject. But what if you let your economics students run the gas station?

For example, what would happen if we one day, out of the blue, decided to charge $8 a gallon for gasoline at our station? Would anyone come? What would be their reasoning if they came? And then suppose, a few months later, we decided to go a little crazy and charge $1.00 a gallon, but not market it any way other than updating our signs. How quickly would the word spread? When would we have a line? Would we see an appreciable sale in other items (e.g., would sales of food and drinks inside rise?) Would absolute mayhem break loose? And could we then construct a demand curve for gasoline? And we could even note that it wasn’t as ‘perfect’ as the textbooks show it. What if we gave gasoline away for free one day?

Having successfully covered price elasticity of demand, we could move onto competition. What would happen if we opened up in view of another gas station, and always updated our price to be one-tenth of a cent less than the guys across the street? Would they catch on and update their pricing? Would we spur a price war? Who would win?

And then, what if we later (after letting things adjust) decided to charge the exact same price as the guy across the street. Would he undercut us, or would he keep his prices the same? (Some of this could get into more complex game theory stuff that I never fully grasped.)

We could also cover complementary goods by looking at trends in, say, how many bottles of oil and windshield-washer fluid we sell.

I know I’m a business geek, but tell me that doing all of this–without worrying about profit–wouldn’t be fun.

Hostile takeovers

So I linked in my last post to the Wikipedia page on mergers and acquisitions, mostly just to clarify what M&As were.

But I ended up perusing the subject a bit, and it gets downright crazy. There’s a whole bunch of hostile takeovers. (Basically, where the board of a company doesn’t agree to be bought out by another company.) And there’s a whole section, Tactics against hostile takeover, which is an amusing read just for the names. A lot of them are downright crazy: the Scorched-earth defense has a company basically destroying its most valuable assets so that it’s less attractive for a takeover. (I’ve been looking for a reason to use the phrase, “Cutting off your nose to spite your face” lately. This is it.)

But the article, Nancy Reagan Defense began the best part. The Defense is to “just say no,” but this is where it gets crazier. They first cite the example of Comcast trying to take over Walt Disney (is this for real?!), and then quote an analyst who mentioned that and another defense: the Pac-Man defense.

The Pac-Man defense is maybe my favorite. When a company is attempting a hostile takeover of your company, your company tries starts buying up shares of that company, to keep them from taking you over. (So you’re basically doing a hostile takeover of the people trying to do a hostile takeover on you.)

My head hurts. I’m going to bed.