Archive for the ‘rants’ Category

Lost Items

Wednesday, February 2nd, 2011

I am writing this (and assuming my wireless connection holds – posting) from the Amtrak Auto Train. Pretty nice ride with power at the seats. Looking out the windows of the top level of this two layer train I can see a lot of things that most people can’t or at least don’t see.

For example passing through one station I could look down on the top of the cover over the platform. There I saw what looked like a perfectly good hack saw. It is unlikely that many who can get to it will ever see it up there. At least until someone some day climbs up to do some sort of work. I wonder if the person who left it there has any clue at all where it was misplaced.

One sees lot of items along the train tracks that just don’t seem to belong. They look lost. I keep thinking that making up stories about how they got there would be an interesting writing exercise. One of these days I’ll remember a good camera on a train trip and take a lot of pictures of such items. Yeah, sure I will. Sad smile

Cutting the clutter in my blog reading

Friday, January 21st, 2011

Something bad happened to the RSS reader I have been using for several years now. It just will not run. Why? No idea. It happened once before and I recovered the data from an old backup and installed on a different computer because no amount of reinstalling would fix it. But that is not important.

What is important was that this time I decided to start with a new online reading tool and restart what blogs I follow from scratch. I was following hundreds of blogs. Really – hundreds. I got a lot out of them but it was time consuming. I just could not bring myself to prune the list.

So today I added all the blogs of people I work with, all the computer science education blogs on my blog role, and a handful of other top education related blogs. Total is less than thirty. I’m sure I will add more over time but perhaps this time I can keep it to a more manageable level.

Though honestly I worry a bit about missing something. Hope I get over it.

Why Experience Matters

Wednesday, January 12th, 2011

A recent Dilbert cartoon had a man saying “I know what I am talking about. I have thirty years in this industry.” Asok the intern asks “How does that help you understand technology that is six months old in a youth-oriented culture?” OK everyone chuckle now – I’ll wait. OK now we know why Asok is still an intern. He doesn’t understand experience.

A lot of people look at a piece of technology that is “six months old” and think that it suddenly sprang from thin air, there there is not previous art that lead up to it, that there is some sort of virgin birth for technology. In truth this almost never happens. In real life technology evolves over time. Not only that technology, at least in the computer field, often moves in cycles. An idea that is a research project one day my 20 years ago suddenly find a missing piece and jump into the mainstream. Having had earlier experience with this sort of technology can help avoid known problems or add ideas that were once “what if” but that are now possible.

Other “new” technologies are reengineering or rethinking of older technologies. Cloud computing for example has huge similarities to old style mainframe computing. Someone with experience can help avoid the pitfalls that lead to first mini-computer and then personal computer paradigm shifts. Just as importantly they can help promote advantages of the “old way” that will work with the “new way” that the youths on the team might not think of at all.

And the bit about youth-oriented culture? Well some of us old people actually used to be youths ourselves. With a good memory we can remember some of it. Good professionals keep up with what is going on in the wider culture too. Do I appreciate Lady Gaga as much as the “kids?” Probably not but that doesn’t mean I don’t understand her. In fact she is a perfect example of what I wrote about here already – anyone else remember Cher? Smile Often times being young means knowing what the latest big thing is without knowing how to make it work. Experience can often help turn the idea of the new cool concept into the reality of the new cool product.

There is a stereotype that says that older more experienced people are slow to change – to adopt new technologies. Sometimes that is true. But my experience (see that “experience”) is that a lot of young people are slow to change as well. Because they often have a narrower background and less experience making changes is often harder for them as well. Experience is very helpful when picking up a new technology.

People with experience have to be careful of falling into the trap that they know everything already. But the young and inexperienced have to be just as careful not to fall into the trap of assuming that the experienced people don’t know anything of current value. Somewhere between knowing all and knowing nothing is the reality. It’s a reality that can greatly benefit those smart enough to tap it.

Smile

Tuesday, January 11th, 2011

The other day I went to pick up my father from the senior center where he spends many of his days. As is my habit I put a smile on my face as I walked in the door. Truth be told I was not that happy. It had been a rough day. But I make it a point to great my father with a smile on my face. I do not want him to misinterpret an expression based on a rough day as being applicable to him. I don’t want him to think that I am upset, frustrated or tired of him. Because I am not.

One of the elderly women in the center saw me and remarked to no one in particular “There he is with a simple as always.” This really struck me. The smile is not something I really think about doing but is automatic. But I wonder how many people do come to pick up older relatives with a frown or other negative expression on their faces. Is it because of the current errand (picking someone up who these see as a burden) or is it just a reflection of the day? One can’t know for sure of course but you have to wonder how it looks to someone who does feel like they are a burden. This made me redouble my practice of smiling but it also made me thing of smiles more broadly.

I believe that a smile makes people more attractive. I figure it is somewhere between 30 and 100 per cent better looking depending on the person and the context. A young woman who smiles that “boy do I think you are amazing” as a young man is probably 200% more attractive to him. Someone should do a study though. I’ll bet there is a real number that could be determined on average. So people who want to be seen as attractive should work on their smile first. It’s a lot easier than dieting or working out and less expensive than fancy clothing.

People should also smile because it makes people happy. Smiles are contagious. In fact I think you can “catch” some happiness from your own smiles.

When I was teaching I used to walk though parts of the school before school starts with a big smile on my face and a happy greeting for all I ran across on my lips. I am not a morning person so this took some work for me. But it seems like I was able to cheer people up if only a little and if only for a moment or to. But by the time my walk was finished I was happier than I was as the start. See a smile makes others happy and so they smile at you. It’s sort of recursive. Or perhaps something of a bootstrap process. But no matter how you describe it I think it is a good thing.

So smile. It will make you better looking and happier. Try it for 50 years and see if I am right. Smile

Building Things

Tuesday, January 11th, 2011

Sunday I built a table. OK maybe a bench would be more accurate. OK maybe I should say that I nailed a bunch of wood together, dropped a section of counter top (it used to be in my kitchen but I replaced it) and am hoping it will hold up under the weight of power tools I am putting on top of it. I have more of these what ever they are to put together because I have other power tools that I need better places to put. Better than sitting on the floor in boxes that is.

I’m not a carpenter. I am not a skilled craftsman by any definition. But I do like to work with wood. Some of my projects come out pretty well. Others, well, not as well. I need practice and could probably benefit from some actual training by someone who really knows what they are doing. Time though is a problem. So I try to figure things out for myself. I read some books. Watch some videos. But mostly I rely on the training I got in high school some 40 years ago. I had a one semester course in patternmaking as a high school freshman. I later had a course in foundry, one in metal work (lathes, drills, etc.), and some sheet metal work. All in all little more than a taste of things. But I learned some concepts and they stuck with me. The high school I attended was an engineering magnet school and these were concepts and practices that were considered important for would be engineers. We also took drafting BTW. With pencils, straight edges and other hand utensils. I learned a lot from that as well.

In of of these classes (in drafting we drew things we later built) we made things. Tangible things. Hard things. Things you could carry. I wonder if we don’t do that enough anymore. Somehow making things makes concepts more real. It is one thing to tell someone that you need angled patterns so that they will come out of the form neatly so  that you can pour molten metal in afterwards and quite enough to have a mold fall apart and be unusable because you didn’t follow the rules.It is one thing to hear about how things are made and quite another to try and do it yourself. The act of creating physical objects is a powerful learning tool.

These days I make things mostly for fun. For my own amusement. I could spend a lot more money and get things professionally built. In some ways, perhaps most ways, those objects would  be prettier, more efficient, quicker to get and generally do the job better. But sometimes, just sometimes, there is more satisfaction in having an ugly, barely functional piece of construction that you really don’t want to show anyone but that solves a need and is something that you built yourself. There is something really satisfying about the process of creation. That is something else I wonder if we allow children enough of. Or do we stop at the building blocks level?

Postpone is not the same as Cancel

Monday, December 27th, 2010

I am so tired of reporters saying that a football game has been cancelled and will now be played on Tuesday. The game was not cancelled. If it had been cancelled it would never be played. It has been postponed which means it will still be played. It will just be played at a different time than originally scheduled.

It’s not just reporters of course. I hear this mistake on a regular basis but news people should understand words. Words matter. Using the right word enhances communication and that is what reporters should largely be about.

Arrg, there – I just screamed on the Internet. Smile

Being a Grown Up

Monday, November 15th, 2010

When one is a kid one sort of wants things they shouldn’t have. Like a lot of ice cream. Since you can’t drive and don’t have control of money you can’t get them unless your parent(s) get them. for you. Your parents are adults and have/take responsibility so you get ice cream sometimes but seldom as much as you want.

Eventually you become an adult and have money and can drive. You can make your own decisions. But somehow you don’t have ice cream (for example) every day and twice on Sunday. Why? When and why do you somehow become the responsible “good” decision maker? One of life’s mysteries.

Note that as I write this I am eating vanilla ice cream with chocolate syrup and Maraschino cherries. I don’t do this often but in a way its nice to know I have the option. That’s part of being an adult to. Right?

Education Professionals and Non Professionals Running Schools

Tuesday, November 2nd, 2010

So my thing to wonder about today is the various attitudes about non-education professionals in education. Specifically it seems that a lot of education professionals attack people like Bill Gates and other would be school reformers from industry and politics for their efforts. They say these are not professional educators and so should stay out of things. OK I can see that line of argument but here is the rub. Most of those same people are strong supporters of local school boards whose memberships are totally made up of, wait for it, non education professionals.

And in fact my experience is that most school board members do less homework and study about education that the big name non-education professional “reformers.” Anyone else see the contradiction here?

Now I have spent time on a school board, six years on the board of a private Catholic K-8 school, time on a public school budget committee (an elected position BTW), and 9 years as a classroom teacher. I’m not sure that makes me an education professional but I do think it makes me more aware of the issues than the average person. And based on those experiences I have concerns about the way we fill school boards for public schools. Some concern about private school boards as well but actually less because the process of selecting board members is very different. But that is a topic for another post.

What I want in someone who makes policy suggestions/decisions for schools is someone who knows what they are talking about. Ideally they read a lot, talk to a lot of people who are education professionals, and have some experience in the classroom – not as a student. This does not fit most school board members but except for the classroom experience does fit a lot of the business and political people who are interested in the issues. So why do people who oppose them support local non-professional school boards? I have a theory.

School boards get almost all of their information from the professional running the school/district. The control of information is the control of the agenda and for the most part of the decisions. The result is that the professionals largely control the board’s decisions. You can see why the critics of school reforms would like this. Educated free-thinkers are generally not welcome on school boards. By controlling information to other interested groups (the PTA can be a very powerful force especially in small town elections) superintendents can often help make sure that board members who disagree with them have a short tenure in office.

Am I being cynical? I don’t think so. I think that many educators who oppose outside reformers and yet support non-professionals on school boards do so only because they know that opposing any sort of outside control is doomed to failure. having ignorant school boards is the next best thing, in their eyes, than no school board at all.

Am I wrong? I’d love to hear (read) a better explanation.

The Education Party of No

Friday, September 24th, 2010

These days a lot of teacher groups (not just unions though they get the attention) are a lot like the Republican party. What am I seriously comparing the teacher unions to Republicans? Well, yes, in a way. They way they are the same is that they are all about saying “no” without offering real competing solutions to real problems. The Republicans are all over the news for obstructing anything the Democrats  and Obama try to do. There is no offering of alternative solutions just a list of why the solutions being offered are wrong/bad/miss the point or what ever. This is of course not helpful but it is working for them because people are angry that Democratic solutions are not working or at least not fast enough. The situation in education is similar and different.

I think there is pretty universal agreement that we have some problems with education in the US. There are groups (Bill Gates and his foundations, the charter school movement, DC school’s chief Michelle Rhee, and others) who are offering their own ideas about fixing things. On the other side are educators who feel that these groups are picking on them, blaming them, and trying to ruin them. So they say “no” to the suggested “solutions.” And they are right in many ways. Standardized tests are a lousy way to judge learning and teacher performance. There really are other problems outside teacher control like poverty, unsupportive parents, kids who are not motivated and more. These problems do have to be addressed for education to be improved. The problem is that they are not offering much in the way of solutions. Just “don’t do what you are suggesting.”

Part of this may be a feeling of powerlessness in the area of they themselves being able to accomplish these changes outside the school building. But teachers could, and I would argue should, be making suggestions as to how to improve the things they can control such as determining who the good and not so good teachers are. Teachers should be working to improve teacher assessment in real and authentic ways. They should be making positive suggests and not just reject other suggestions from outsiders.

And teachers need to make more suggestions about how to asses students. I hear over and over again that teachers do assess students and that they do a good job. The problem is that the end results of our educational system, in some ways, call into question the accuracy of many assessments. We see “honor students” who reach college and can not handle the work there. We see high school graduates who lack basic skills in things like math and English when  they get their first jobs. While we see many graduates with good education we see far too many who seem to have gotten their diplomas without actually learning much. The reason outsiders press for standardized testing is a lack of trust in the assessment job that too many teachers are doing. Fixing that credibility problem is the key to holding back on standardized testing. It has to come by improving assessment, improving teaching and teachers, and helping to clean house of the worst teachers.

There are many huge problems that good teachers can not completely overcome. No doubt about that. But we have to remember that there are few educational problems that a bad teacher can’t make worse.

[Note that these are my opinions and may not be shared by anyone else I know.]

Lone Star TV Show Review

Monday, September 20th, 2010

So last week I received an email from Klout offering me a preview package to watch a pilot of the new show Lone Star on the FOX network. In exchange they included this message.

  • If you accept the offer you are not required to do anything. We do not want to "buy" your tweets. You are receiving the product because you are influential and have authority on topics related to the product. This is a more targeted form of receiving a sample while shopping at the grocery store. You are welcome to tell the world you love the product, you hate the product or say nothing at all.

How could I refuse? Well I guess I could and I guess a lot of people might. The truth is that taking some sort of gift often does make people feel like they owe something. In my case I feel like I owe them actually watching the show and giving a review. I don’t feel I owe them a favorable review. Which is good because I didn’t much like the show. I loved the goodie box though. So a review they get.

I don’t like con artists. Oh sure there are lots of con  game shows on TV I do like. I’ll watch Leverage anytime its own and it is largely a con game show. The difference is that the bad guys get conned in the shows I like and the main character is coning good people. Now this is a story of a man, Bob Allen, changing his heart and mind about his line of work. If it focuses on his trying to go straight in future episodes, and it looks like that is the goal, I might get to like the show. The character of his father though is truly hateful to me and that is a drawback. The man is so sold on conning people as being the right way to live that he insists on his son staying on the broad and crooked.

John Vought is down right scary as the oil magnate father of the main character’s first wife. There is some ambiguity about him. Is he evil or just tough? He’s clearly no nonsense and a bit of tension is always going to be there in this show about what would happen if he learns the truth about his son in law. And of course he has a son who is out to get Bob Allen since his father put him in charge of the oil company. And a second son is likely to have torn loyalties because Bob Allen as the new CEO is running with some of the projects the younger son has been suggesting over the years but getting shot down about. Family drama ala Dallas.

Oh and Bob Allen wants to keep things going with his girl friend who lives in a town where he has been coming lots of people out of their money. Yep, a girl friend and a wife. IS this guy totally crazy? He thinks he is in love with both. Possible? I guess we’ll see.

The women in the show, the wife and girl friend, are the two characters I do like. They are both in love and seem to be supportive of their man. They seem honest and good. Seems a shame they got mixed up with this guy.

I may watch another episode to see where it goes. Pilots can be a hard thing to base a show on because there is so much set up going on. So if you like shows about criminals trying to go straight or con artists give Lone Star a try and maybe a second episode. If there is a limit to how much tension you like in a show (and there is for me) you may want to give this one a pass. Either way it starts tonight on FOX.