{"id":408,"date":"2007-12-30T13:14:25","date_gmt":"2007-12-30T18:14:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.n1zyy.com\/n1zyy\/2007\/12\/30\/high-dynamic-range\/"},"modified":"2007-12-30T13:14:25","modified_gmt":"2007-12-30T18:14:25","slug":"high-dynamic-range","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.n1zyy.com\/n1zyy\/2007\/12\/30\/high-dynamic-range\/","title":{"rendered":"High Dynamic Range"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;d been seeing a lot about HDR, or High Dynamic Range, photography. In layman&#8217;s terms, the <em>dynamic range<\/em> of a camera is the range from the darkest to the lightest parts a camera can record in one shot. The problem is that the dynamic range of cameras doesn&#8217;t match real life that often.<\/p>\n<p>Long ago, photographers found a halfway decent solution: graduated filters. Basically, you stick a filter in front of the lens, with part of it darker than the rest. It&#8217;s great if, say, you want to take a great picture at the beach with both foreground detail <em>and<\/em> the sky properly exposed.<\/p>\n<p>With computers, though, there&#8217;s been another photo. You take a series of bracketed shots: one or two for the sky, one or two for the foreground, etc. Some people have been known to stitch together close to a dozen. Having a tripod helps tremendously here, since the images need to be pretty much exactly the same besides exposure.<\/p>\n<p>Strictly, HDR requires more than a monitor can really display, but a technique called tone mapping is often used. The basic premise is to take the &#8220;good&#8221; parts of each shot in a bracketed series and stitch them together. Photoshop CS2 and newer has an HDR utility, though I&#8217;ve been pretty unimpressed with the results. Today I started playing around with an Open Source tool called <a href=\"http:\/\/qtpfsgui.sourceforge.net\/\">Qtpfsgui<\/a>. It&#8217;s even cross-platform! It supports multiple algorithms for doing tone mapping, too.<\/p>\n<p>Overall, I&#8217;m still not that happy with the results, but it&#8217;s a start. Here&#8217;s a &#8216;normal&#8217; shot of the beach, taken on Cape Cod yesterday:<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_mmd_0\" class=\"wp-block-image alignnone\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/n1zyy\/2148831409\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"> title=&#8221;Beach by n1zyy, on Flickr&#8221;><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/farm3.static.flickr.com\/2148\/2148831409_df067720bf.jpg\" width=\"500\" height=\"333\" alt=\"Beach\"><\/a><\/figure>\n<p>You&#8217;ll note that the foreground (e.g., the bench) is too dark, yet the sky is too light. It&#8217;s a good illustration of insufficient dynamic range.<\/p>\n<p>Luckily, I knew in the back of my head that I wanted to try my hand at HDR photography, so I saw it as an opportunity. I set my camera to meter -2 to +2 EV, to try to cover the full range. The end product:<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_mmd_1\" class=\"wp-block-image alignnone\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/n1zyy\/2148843753\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"> title=&#8221;Fattal Algorithm by n1zyy, on Flickr&#8221;><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/farm3.static.flickr.com\/2235\/2148843753_a11798f46b.jpg\" width=\"500\" height=\"313\" alt=\"Fattal Algorithm\"><\/a><\/figure>\n<p>It displays a very common pet peeve of mine with HDR photos: it looks entirely unrealistic. Absurd, even. I think part of it&#8217;s that it&#8217;s just overdone, and that the contrast is jacked way up. I want to play around with it more and see if I can get a more natural product. So far, no luck. But, at least in a technical sense, it&#8217;s an improvement over the first image.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;d like to see HDR come a little further, so that HDR photos don&#8217;t have the same, &#8220;Whoa!&#8221; quality that a scary old lady with <em>way<\/em> too much makeup has. I don&#8217;t think the limitations are entirely technical at this point, either.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;d been seeing a lot about HDR, or High Dynamic Range, photography. In layman&#8217;s terms, the dynamic range of a camera is the range from the darkest to the lightest parts a camera can record in one shot. The problem &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.n1zyy.com\/n1zyy\/2007\/12\/30\/high-dynamic-range\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,5,12,18,20,22,24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-408","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-computers","category-cool-links","category-interesting","category-ocd","category-photography","category-programming","category-rants-raves"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.n1zyy.com\/n1zyy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/408","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.n1zyy.com\/n1zyy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.n1zyy.com\/n1zyy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.n1zyy.com\/n1zyy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.n1zyy.com\/n1zyy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=408"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.n1zyy.com\/n1zyy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/408\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.n1zyy.com\/n1zyy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=408"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.n1zyy.com\/n1zyy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=408"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.n1zyy.com\/n1zyy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=408"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}