{"id":4063,"date":"2015-03-27T22:25:01","date_gmt":"2015-03-28T02:25:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.n1zyy.com\/n1zyy\/?p=4063"},"modified":"2015-03-27T22:25:01","modified_gmt":"2015-03-28T02:25:01","slug":"dog-whistle-politics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.n1zyy.com\/n1zyy\/2015\/03\/27\/dog-whistle-politics\/","title":{"rendered":"Dog-whistle politics"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I pretty recently learned the phrase <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Dog-whistle_politics\">dog-whistle politics<\/a>. The idea is that certain phrases have hidden, extra meaning to certain people. The Wikipedia page gives state&#8217;s rights as an example where political comments often have a more nuanced meaning that&#8217;s semi-concealed.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;s properly the same concept, but one apparent example of this I&#8217;ve become really interested in is the &#8220;Black lives matter&#8221; and &#8220;All lives matter&#8221; phrases. &#8220;Black lives matter&#8221; became a common refrain after Michael Brown&#8217;s shooting, and came to encompass a general frustration (probably too tame of a term) at the apparent disregard for how many people of color were shot by police. And, much like the proper definitions of feminism, I think that&#8217;s a cause that <em>everyone<\/em> should support.<\/p>\n<p>But then, &#8220;All lives matter&#8221; and &#8220;Police lives matter&#8221; became common counter-arguments. And I saw many tweets along the lines of, &#8220;People who don&#8217;t attack cops don&#8217;t get shot. #policelivesmatter.&#8221; It started to be associated with people who argued that Darren Wilson was innocent (or even, in some people&#8217;s strange opinions, &#8220;a hero&#8221;), and that Michael Brown pretty much deserved to be shot. (To be clear, that is not my opinion.)<\/p>\n<p>I remember being very upset upon reading a tweet that said something like, &#8220;On 9\/11, many police officers knowingly ran INTO the Twin Towers. #policelivesmatter&#8221; And I realized that it had reached the point where the actual words used were entirely irrelevant.<\/p>\n<p>The literal meaning, and that a person not familiar with a lot of backstory, was one that <em>everyone<\/em> would agree with: there were so many heroes in the NYPD that willingly gave their lives on 9\/11, and saying that their lives matter is so patently obvious that it seems weird to even mention.<\/p>\n<p>But the reason it seems so weird to mention is that there&#8217;s a lot of hidden meaning, or at least that I read into it. It reads like a counter to the &#8220;black lives matter&#8221; people, in a time with a lot of police brutality being discussed in the news. What I read wasn&#8217;t a lot different from, &#8220;Black people need to quit complaining about being disproportionately harmed by police violence. I side with the police who choked Eric Gardner.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The point here isn&#8217;t whether I correctly read the meaning, nor who is correct. I&#8217;m merely fascinated by how some terms or concepts can become so incredibly charged that people read into them meanings that aren&#8217;t contained in the actual words said. Because of the specific phrasing and the timing\/context of a comment, I took a tweet expressing gratitude for NYPD officers who gave their lives on 9\/11 as an appallingly racist, hateful message. And that is utterly fascinating to me.<\/p>\n<p>But this isn&#8217;t isolated. Conversations about the Confederate flag, &#8220;religious freedom,&#8221; or &#8220;women&#8217;s rights&#8221; often conjure up extremely strong emotions and opinions, even where they&#8217;re not necessarily intended. And just try to have a rational conversation about gun control or the Second Amendment, or immigration policy. The terms are so charged with meanings you likely don&#8217;t even intend.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I pretty recently learned the phrase dog-whistle politics. The idea is that certain phrases have hidden, extra meaning to certain people. The Wikipedia page gives state&#8217;s rights as an example where political comments often have a more nuanced meaning that&#8217;s &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.n1zyy.com\/n1zyy\/2015\/03\/27\/dog-whistle-politics\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4063","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.n1zyy.com\/n1zyy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4063","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.n1zyy.com\/n1zyy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.n1zyy.com\/n1zyy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.n1zyy.com\/n1zyy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.n1zyy.com\/n1zyy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4063"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.n1zyy.com\/n1zyy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4063\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.n1zyy.com\/n1zyy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4063"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.n1zyy.com\/n1zyy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4063"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.n1zyy.com\/n1zyy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4063"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}