Electron Hut: Kyle Bedell’s Blog

It’s not what you look at that matters, it’s what you see.

Does the walker choose the path, or does the path choose the walker?

with one comment

When I in the middle of the college application process in high school, I knew I wanted to do something that involved either or both of the following:

  • Working with people
  • Working with consumer electronics products

I thought about going to school for psychology…until I realized that there was the whole problem of having to go for a doctorate if I really wanted to be a psychologist. How does one pay the bills in the interm? I told myself “Self, I’ll be damned if I end up being the ‘computer guy’ for the rest of my life,” so initially, I swore off going to school for any sort of computer science program. I settled on Bentley with the idea in my head that I would go for marketing. This was after seeing a particularly awesome class on product prototyping (with popcorn!) during an open house. I had planned on getting a minor in something like food science, then going off and doing research and development somewhere in the food industry. Science! Food! Products! People! What could be better?

Then I was informed, during a CIS information session of all things, that getting there required a decade or two’s worth of climbing up the corporate ladder (in sales! Noooo!). All of the recent CIS majors there had converted from marketing, and a quick survey of salary information said that marketing was probably not the direction I wanted to head in. I switched to Computer Information Systems soon after, though I ‘kept in touch’ with my love of the social sciences and people in general through lots of philosophy and sociology courses. (for electives).

I noticed throughout my undergraduate education that I enjoyed low-level hardware stuff the most. My favorite classes in the undergraduate CIS program were Irv Englander’s CS240 course (Business Processing and Communications Infrastructure) and David YatesCS440 (Advanced Net-Centric Computing). While the other classes were informative (and I’m happy I know all about database backends and programming), I just didn’t get the same kick out of them that I did with my electives or the “nitty-gritty” CS classes. I figured out that while what you can do with a technology is important, I was happier learning and focusing on the technology itself. “Nevermind that this particular handheld has a GPS and navigation software built in; what I want to know is what’s running under the hood? How powerful is this GPS chipset compared to others? Is there a better technical solution?” It’s with the rare devices that I pick up that manage to impress me not only with their usefulness, but with their technical specifications as well, that I love the most. I know that sounds backwards, but that’s how my brain operates. I look for technical superiority first and then examine the ‘applications’.

But I digress. Around this time last year (Feb. 2007), I more-or-less realized that I didn’t want to program or do database work at all. This left me in sort of a pickle; how do I leverage my love of technology with my love of people? I like to dabble in all sorts of fields too, so I asked myself “How can I interact in as many fields as possible in a particular job?”

Human Factors was my answer. I had to go to graduate school to get a degree in it (and it’s been tough so far!), but I had found the major that combined everything I loved to do.

  • I get to work with people all the time (users, clients, all sorts of folks).
  • I get to dabble in tons of different fields, and I need to learn something about all of them to work successfully with a client. One week I can be working on medical devices, the next a website for a game development company. Maybe a telephone or some specialty accounting software the next week. There’s a lot of variety here, and I think that’s what appealed to me more than anything else.
  • It’s part marketing, part psychology, and part technology. Evaluating and improving product and website designs from a user-centric perspective requires a passion for all of these things. I’ve always thought of myself as something of a renaissance man, so what better way to “do everything” than to work with people from all walks of life?

Does the walker choose the path, or does the path choose the walker? Either way, I certainly am excited about where this path is taking me!

Written by Kyle

February 19th, 2008 at 10:45 pm

Posted in Life, Nostalgia, Philosophy

One Response to 'Does the walker choose the path, or does the path choose the walker?'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Does the walker choose the path, or does the path choose the walker?'.

  1. Keep in mind that you will have another choice facing you when you come out of the program: corporate life or consulting. With consulting, you get to see the variety of products you described. But, the downside includes not being able to be involved in the entire product lifecycle (usually). You also will likely have to do a bit more traveling.

    In a corporate scenario, you get to mold a product, and have a greater budget and timeframe to do it in (again, usually). You get to really know your audience.

    I’m glad you like the decision you made. It’s one of the best ones I ever made too. Every step I’ve made has been a logical progression, just like yours. Except you found the field a little earlier than me.

    Andrew Wirtanen

    20 Feb 08 at 5:29 am

Leave a Reply