<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;m joining the rest of the hordes&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.n1zyy.com/trokair/2007/09/06/im-joining-the-rest-of-the-hordes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.n1zyy.com/trokair/2007/09/06/im-joining-the-rest-of-the-hordes/</link>
	<description>It's not what you look at that matters, it's what you see.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: n1zyy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.n1zyy.com/trokair/2007/09/06/im-joining-the-rest-of-the-hordes/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>n1zyy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 01:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.n1zyy.com/trokair/2007/09/06/im-joining-the-rest-of-the-hordes/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>The Shuffle is kind of cool. It'd be handy for, say, putting a "Jogging Music" playlist on. I wouldn't buy it &lt;i&gt;and&lt;/i&gt; another flash-based player, but if I were to just get one, or if my other one were a disk-based one, I'd certainly consider it.

The 160GB classic is just obscenely large. (Not that I'm complaining!) I have a 30GB iPod and kind of chuckle at the little bar graph of how much I'm using -- I have 4GB of music and maybe half a gig of movies (TV shows).

The iPod Touch is definitely spiffy. I don't get the people complaining about 16GB of storage. (Especially flash-based storage.) Although an iPod Touch (and an iPhone) with the classic's 160GB disk would be &lt;i&gt;incredible&lt;/i&gt;! (There was some complaining that there's no 'best' iPod right now -- you could get the Classic if you want lots of space, the Touch for the interface, the Nano for the small size...)

The $100 in store credit is a decent compromise, although not as good as just refunding $200. (But then again, what Apple did was just sound business practice -- extracting maximum consumer value...) I'd have handed out $201 (not a typo) in iTMS gift cards myself.

I almost feel bad for the Zune. It's probably a good device, but it has so many things wrong... Including the &lt;a href="http://faruk.newsvine.com/_news/2006/11/12/438632-zune-install-screen-raises-eyebrows" rel="nofollow"&gt;orgasm&lt;/a&gt; [NSFW?] installation picture, their &lt;a href="http://bp2.blogger.com/_pNJFZtinpKY/RtIv9sbwnpI/AAAAAAAABqQ/78zmM88KWAc/s1600-h/brown.png" rel="nofollow"&gt;upside-down logo&lt;/a&gt; [NSFW], and the fact that it's... Brown. BUT, it does seem kind of slick, and the FM tuner is a good idea. Overall, I'd call it a good idea but bad implementation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Shuffle is kind of cool. It&#8217;d be handy for, say, putting a &#8220;Jogging Music&#8221; playlist on. I wouldn&#8217;t buy it <i>and</i> another flash-based player, but if I were to just get one, or if my other one were a disk-based one, I&#8217;d certainly consider it.</p>
<p>The 160GB classic is just obscenely large. (Not that I&#8217;m complaining!) I have a 30GB iPod and kind of chuckle at the little bar graph of how much I&#8217;m using &#8212; I have 4GB of music and maybe half a gig of movies (TV shows).</p>
<p>The iPod Touch is definitely spiffy. I don&#8217;t get the people complaining about 16GB of storage. (Especially flash-based storage.) Although an iPod Touch (and an iPhone) with the classic&#8217;s 160GB disk would be <i>incredible</i>! (There was some complaining that there&#8217;s no &#8216;best&#8217; iPod right now &#8212; you could get the Classic if you want lots of space, the Touch for the interface, the Nano for the small size&#8230;)</p>
<p>The $100 in store credit is a decent compromise, although not as good as just refunding $200. (But then again, what Apple did was just sound business practice &#8212; extracting maximum consumer value&#8230;) I&#8217;d have handed out $201 (not a typo) in iTMS gift cards myself.</p>
<p>I almost feel bad for the Zune. It&#8217;s probably a good device, but it has so many things wrong&#8230; Including the <a href="http://faruk.newsvine.com/_news/2006/11/12/438632-zune-install-screen-raises-eyebrows" rel="nofollow">orgasm</a> [NSFW?] installation picture, their <a href="http://bp2.blogger.com/_pNJFZtinpKY/RtIv9sbwnpI/AAAAAAAABqQ/78zmM88KWAc/s1600-h/brown.png" rel="nofollow">upside-down logo</a> [NSFW], and the fact that it&#8217;s&#8230; Brown. BUT, it does seem kind of slick, and the FM tuner is a good idea. Overall, I&#8217;d call it a good idea but bad implementation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
