It's a blog.
This comic was pretty funny, and the age/2 + 7 formula got tossed around a lot by my roommates.
Of course, it gives us the minimum age one can date without being creepy. At 22, it’s [(22/2) + 7], or 18. (I, however, maintain that this discrepancy would, in fact, be creepy.)
But what about the upper age limit? The formula itself is silent on this, but we can easily do some substitution to make it work. If the minimum acceptable age (“M”) is your own age (“A”) divided by two, plus 7, we get:
M = A/2 + 7
We typically solve for M, knowing A. However, the oldest person I could date would have my A as their M, e.g.:
22 = A/2 + 7
With this realization, it’s a simple Algebra 1 question. Subtract 7 from both sides and then multiply by two.
Thus, the maximum age one can date is 2(a-7), where a is your age. For me, it’d be 2(22-7), or 30.
What interests me, though, is that this means I’m allowed to go back four years, but forward eight, within the margin of creepiness.
I built a spreadsheet for people aged 1 to 100 showing this and various other statistics. It’s online here as an HTML document. A few interesting trends emerge that aren’t intuitively obvious working with just the formulas:
Related posts:
2 Responses to Missing the Point
Mr. T
June 2nd, 2008 at 12:08 am
You noticed that bit at the end of the comic about people who create graphs on the weekend right?
BTW 96 is way above my creepy limit for people my age to date. I don’t think that formula scales upwards. And honestly in our society the scales for men and women are different. They shouldn’t be but you know that old line about theory and practice not being the same thing? It applies here.
Matt
June 2nd, 2008 at 11:27 am
“Somewhere at the edge of the bell curve is the girl for me.”
And I think you’re right about that formula… 96 would definitely be creepy.