<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to get really rich</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.n1zyy.com/mistert/2011/04/09/how-to-get-really-rich/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.n1zyy.com/mistert/2011/04/09/how-to-get-really-rich/</link>
	<description>Random thoughts, half thoughts, and just plain stuff I want to blog about</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 21:57:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.n1zyy.com/mistert/2011/04/09/how-to-get-really-rich/comment-page-1/#comment-864</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 03:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.n1zyy.com/mistert/2011/04/09/how-to-get-really-rich/#comment-864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was thinking about the &quot;luck&quot; aspect recently, actually. I think you can be really smart and work really hard building something really great, but at the end of the day, luck is still a big factor in whether it catches on or not.

Mark Zuckerburg could have built Facebook and had no one really care initially, leaving it as a Harvard-only site with a few thousand users. The iPod could have failed to catch on, leaving Apple a tiny little company. Bill Gates definitely has brains and definitely worked hard, but his OS totally could have failed to gain traction early on, leaving Microsoft a tiny little company making an obscure OS.

There are lots of startups and dot-bombs in the past that did really awesome stuff. It could certainly be argued that smarts were lacking in some cases, but I think there were a lot of companies that had the smarts and hard work needed, but not the luck to make it big.

I&#039;m trying to think of examples of dumb people not working hard and accidentally hitting it big. I&#039;m sure there are some, but the examples aren&#039;t coming to mind as readily.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking about the &#8220;luck&#8221; aspect recently, actually. I think you can be really smart and work really hard building something really great, but at the end of the day, luck is still a big factor in whether it catches on or not.</p>
<p>Mark Zuckerburg could have built Facebook and had no one really care initially, leaving it as a Harvard-only site with a few thousand users. The iPod could have failed to catch on, leaving Apple a tiny little company. Bill Gates definitely has brains and definitely worked hard, but his OS totally could have failed to gain traction early on, leaving Microsoft a tiny little company making an obscure OS.</p>
<p>There are lots of startups and dot-bombs in the past that did really awesome stuff. It could certainly be argued that smarts were lacking in some cases, but I think there were a lot of companies that had the smarts and hard work needed, but not the luck to make it big.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m trying to think of examples of dumb people not working hard and accidentally hitting it big. I&#8217;m sure there are some, but the examples aren&#8217;t coming to mind as readily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
