<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Less is More</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.n1zyy.com/andrew/2009/08/20/less-is-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.n1zyy.com/andrew/2009/08/20/less-is-more/</link>
	<description>Just another Blogs.n1zyy.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 01:51:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.n1zyy.com/andrew/2009/08/20/less-is-more/comment-page-1/#comment-2186</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.n1zyy.com/andrew/2009/08/20/less-is-more/#comment-2186</guid>
		<description>I saw the same thing, and was equally as impressed with the move.

But what disappointed me was that it seems like an all-around unremarkable camera. It&#039;s hardly junk, but for the price, you can get much more in terms of features, etc. And if you&#039;re paying that much more for image quality or low noise, why wouldn&#039;t you just get a digital SLR?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw the same thing, and was equally as impressed with the move.</p>
<p>But what disappointed me was that it seems like an all-around unremarkable camera. It&#8217;s hardly junk, but for the price, you can get much more in terms of features, etc. And if you&#8217;re paying that much more for image quality or low noise, why wouldn&#8217;t you just get a digital SLR?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

